Printer-Friendly Page
|
Ask President Burrus
Question:
Why don’t the postal unions merge into one? Wouldn’t we (all the workers) be stronger with only one union? Why do the unions let the USPS play the divide-and-conquer game?
Jon, Central Michigan Area Local
Similar Questions from:
Mike, Cleveland Area Local
Mike, St. Paul (MN) Area Local
Brian, Central Arkansas Area Local
President Burrus:
Thank you for writing.
APWU members understand that there is strength in numbers and often question why the four postal unions do not merge into a single union. Obviously, such a merger would create a significantly larger, stronger union than any of the existing organizations.
As an industrial union, the APWU endorses the basic principle that workers employed by a single entity are better served when they are united as a single force. Our union constitution embodies this principle with the following commitment:
The APWU affirms its belief in a single union of all postal workers in non-supervisory levels. The APWU will make every effort to bring into being a single union of all postal workers by mergers with other postal unions, and initiating intensive all-out organizing campaigns reflecting the APWU philosophy. (Article 2.2)
Furthermore, the APWU constitution calls for specific action to help achieve this goal:
The American Postal Workers Union shall request and make every effort to secure a meeting with the National Association of Letter Carriers, a minimum of once a year, for the sole purpose of discussing and moving in the direction of eventual merger. (Article 2.11)
As president of APWU I embrace these principles, and I have attempted to initiate the dialogue necessary to achieving this significant goal.
Regrettably, I have received no response to my written requests.
Oct. 20, 2005
