
| Reader Comment | Fri Oct 27, 2006 6:45 am |
| A loss of jobs or just relocation to Mobile? Someone needs to make that point clear. I don't think that there will be 280 people LOSE their job over this. I think that 280 people might have to move, but that isn't losing a job. | |
| Posted by: Pacedog | |
| Reader Comment | Fri Oct 27, 2006 8:33 am |
| Pace considering what the housing situation is here
right now because of taxes, overinflation on prices and
insurance........how would anyone afford to move?Unless they could afford
to buy a house there while trying to sell their house here.....you get the
drift. Does the move means all the mail carriers would be driving individual mail trucks from mobile to Pensacola?How long would it take them to know what their route is?What happens when their is a major wreck on I10?How far does Pensacola's present distribution reach? | |
| Posted by: Donald Skipper | |
| READER COMMENT | Fri Oct 27, 2006 2:19 pm |
| LIKE ANY DECISION AFFECTING JOBS IT USUALLY BOILS DOWN TO SAVING MONEY, AND A FEW POSTAL WORKERS PICKETING AND USING ""NOT HAVING A PENSACOLA POSTMARK "IS NOT A GOOD ENOUGH REASON TO KEEP THE FACILITY HERE. MY QUESTION IS WHY AREN'T THOSE PEOPLE UPSET ABOUT LOSING THEIR JOBS ASKING THEIR UNION TO MEET WITH THE LOCAL POSTAL MANAGEMENT TO SEE WHAT IT WILL TAKE TO KEEP THIS FACILITY HERE. I'AM NOT TALKING ABOUT CUTTING WAGES OR BENEFITS THESE THINGS ARE PROBABLY NEGOTIATED AND CAN'T CHANGE UNDER THEIR CURRENT CONTRACT BUT WHAT CAN CHANGE IS THE WAY THEY DO BUSINESS AND HOW THEY CAN PRODUCTIVELY IMPROVE HOW THEY PERFORM THEIR WORK. MAYBE IF THIS HAPPENED THE MOBILE FACILITY WOULD BE MOVED TO PENSACOLA BEVCAUSE IT WAS MORE COST EFFICIENT. | |
| Posted by: david hartger | |
| Postal Plant Potential Move | Sat Oct 28, 2006 1:30 am |
| Overheard comment in the check-out line earlier this week: "I get paid to show up. It's up to my boss to make me work! Ha! Ha!" "Aren't you with the Post Office?" "Yeah, the Plant on Jordan Street." "Ever worry about losing your job?" "Nah, the Union keeps the bosses too busy to watch anybody." If this is an example of the workers' attitude no wonder Fedex and UPS are big business. Maybe Pensacola wouldn't be on the hit list if the employees took some initiative. | |
| Posted by: one chili pepper | |
| Reader Comment | Sat Oct 28, 2006 1:41 pm |
| Plant consolidation has very little to do with
saving money. The few places that it has actually happened, it has cost
the postal service more money. Mail will be delayed if this happens. The
Pensacola plant processes all the mail in the 325 area. That means from
Century to Baker to Destin and everywhere in between. Can you imagine your
mail going from Destin 2 or more hours everyday to Mobile and back again.
Somedays it just won't make it. If the post office really wanted to save
money, it would reduce the excessive discounts it gives to big business.
They don't pay 39 cents a letter like the rest of us, more like 23 or
less. As far a anybody losing their job. Pensacola will lose those jobs. The employees would have to relocate to Mobile or commute if they chose to stay with the postal service. As was mentioned earlier, it would be very difficult in this housing market to do that. Postal productivity is at an all time high and they are doing it with less people. Trying to move people around or cut their pay and benefits(it is contract time) is not the answer. | |
| Posted by: Rhastus | |