Mail Handler Award: Validity of Untimely Step 2 Decision (2009)

Step 2 Decision , untimely step 2 decision , no step 2 meeting

return to Contract Database

The APWU properly intervened in this NPMHU National Arbitration. The Arbitrator concluded that a Step 2 decision issued by the USPS after the grievance was properly appealed to Step 3 because of the USPS' failure to meet within the Article 15 timeframes "has no validity, force or effect" under the NPMHU CBA.

Document Type:  National Arbitration

GATS Number:  l94M-ll-C-98072898

Arbitrator Name: Dana Eischen

Tags: Step 2 Decision , untimely step 2 decision , no step 2 meeting

return to Contract Database

Related Documents

SHOW FILTERS ›

E.g., 11/26/2022
E.g., 11/26/2022

Step 4 Agreement: Held in Abeyance MOU (2005)

January 7, 2005

Document Type: National Pre-Arbitration Settlement

National Disputes, Cases held pending

MOU: LMOU for Offices Without a Local Union Structure (2016)

December 21, 2016

Document Type: Memorandum of Understanding

Local Memorandum of Understanding, LMOU

MOU: Grievance Enhancement and Reduction AUGER Procedure (2015)

May 27, 2015

Document Type: Memorandum of Understanding

APWU-USPS Grievance Enhancement and Reduction Procedure, AUGER, Joint Grievance File

Step 4 Agreement: Late Step 2 Decision (2013)

January 11, 2013

Document Type: Step 4 Agreement

APWU National Grievance Number: HQTG200525

time limits, Step 2 Decision, additions and corrections

Q & A: 2010 CBA - Article 1.6, PSE, Conversion to NTFT, Article 12, Transfer Opportunities, Lead Clerk, 204-B, & Article 15 (2011)

October 20, 2011

Document Type: Question & Answer

2010 CBA, 2010 National Agreement, Questions and Answers, Q & A

Q & A: 2010 CBA - Article 1.6, PSE, Conversion to NTFT, Article 12, Transfer Opportunities, Lead Clerk, 204-B, & Article 15 (2011)

October 20, 2011

Document Type: Question & Answer

2010 CBA, 10210 National Agreement, Questions and Answers, Q & A