SPSS Merits Award
The Arbitrator, for the reasons set forth in the above Opinion, denies the following claims: the claim by the National Postal Mail Handlers Union [NPMHU], that the issuance by the United States Postal Service, on August 7, 2015, of the revised Craft Determination for the Small Parcel Sorter System [SPSS], was improper, insofar as the USPS changed its June 1, 2015, award of the “singulating”/“facing” work on the platform to Mail Handler Craft employees, by awarding such work to the Clerk Craft employees, and by its related assignment to those Clerks of some of the “sweeping” work (removing full containers from the SPSS and replacing them with empty containers) for rotational purposes only, insofar as such assignments were inconsistent with RI-399 Craft determination principles and with certain previously decided Arbitration Opinions and Awards; the claim by the American Postal Workers Union [APWU] that the USPS, in its revised determination of August 7, 2015, improperly awarded “sweeping” work to Mail Handler Craft employees, as the primary Craft, with the award of some of the “sweeping” work, for rotational purposes only, to those Clerk Craft employees who were assigned to perform the work of “singulating”/“facing” parcels, rather than assigning all of the “sweeping” work to Clerk Craft employees. 61 AWARD The Arbitrator, for the reasons set forth in the above Opinion, denies the following claims: the claim by the National Postal Mail Handlers Union [NPMHU], that the issuance by the United States Postal Service, on August 7, 2015, of the revised Craft Determination for the Small Parcel Sorter System [SPSS], was improper, insofar as the USPS changed its June 1, 2015, award of the “singulating”/“facing” work on the platform to Mail Handler Craft employees, by awarding such work to the Clerk Craft employees, and by its related assignment to those Clerks of some of the “sweeping” work (removing full containers from the SPSS and replacing them with empty containers) for rotational purposes only, insofar as such assignments were inconsistent with RI-399 Craft determination principles and with certain previously decided Arbitration Opinions and Awards; the claim by the American Postal Workers Union [APWU] that the USPS, in its revised determination of August 7, 2015, improperly awarded “sweeping” work to Mail Handler Craft employees, as the primary Craft, with the award of some of the “sweeping” work, for rotational purposes only, to those Clerk Craft employees who were assigned to perform the work of “singulating”/ “facing” parcels, rather than assigning all of the “sweeping” work to Clerk Craft employees.
Return to Contract DatabaseThe Arbitrator, for the reasons set forth in the above Opinion, denies the
 following claims: the claim by the National Postal Mail Handlers Union
 [NPMHU], that the issuance by the United States Postal Service, on August 7,
 2015, of the revised Craft Determination for the Small Parcel Sorter System
 [SPSS], was improper, insofar as the USPS changed its June 1, 2015, award of
 the “singulating”/“facing” work on the platform to Mail Handler Craft
 employees, by awarding such work to the Clerk Craft employees, and by its
 related assignment to those Clerks of some of the “sweeping” work (removing
 full containers from the SPSS and replacing them with empty containers) for
 rotational purposes only, insofar as such assignments were inconsistent with
 RI-399 Craft determination principles and with certain previously decided
 Arbitration Opinions and Awards; the claim by the American Postal Workers
 Union [APWU] that the USPS, in its revised determination of August 7, 2015,
 improperly awarded “sweeping” work to Mail Handler Craft employees, as the
 primary Craft, with the award of some of the “sweeping” work, for rotational
 purposes only, to those Clerk Craft employees who were assigned to perform
 the work of “singulating”/“facing” parcels, rather than assigning all of the
 “sweeping” work to Clerk Craft employees.
 61
 AWARD
 The Arbitrator, for the reasons set forth in the above
 Opinion, denies the following claims: the claim by the
 National Postal Mail Handlers Union [NPMHU], that
 the issuance by the United States Postal Service, on
 August 7, 2015, of the revised Craft Determination for
 the Small Parcel Sorter System [SPSS], was improper,
 insofar as the USPS changed its June 1, 2015, award of
 the “singulating”/“facing” work on the platform to
 Mail Handler Craft employees, by awarding such work
 to the Clerk Craft employees, and by its related
 assignment to those Clerks of some of the “sweeping”
 work (removing full containers from the SPSS and
 replacing them with empty containers) for rotational
 purposes only, insofar as such assignments were
 inconsistent with RI-399 Craft determination
 principles and with certain previously decided
 Arbitration Opinions and Awards; the claim by the
 American Postal Workers Union [APWU] that the
 USPS, in its revised determination of August 7, 2015,
 improperly awarded “sweeping” work to Mail Handler
 Craft employees, as the primary Craft, with the award
 of some of the “sweeping” work, for rotational
 purposes only, to those Clerk Craft employees who
 were assigned to perform the work of “singulating”/
 “facing” parcels, rather than assigning all of the
 “sweeping” work to Clerk Craft employees.