Appeals to Arbitration

The following Maintenance Craft disputes were recently appealed to arbitration:

Q06T40C10122810 - Whether the Postal Service violated Articles 19 and 32 Section I of the National Agreement. Section 535 of the Administrative Support Manual and the MS-22 Handbook when it made its decision to implement an initiative known as the Letter Box Refurbishment Program?

Q06T40C11102616 - Whether the Postal Service violated Articles 19 and 32 Section 1 of the National Agreement and Section 535 of the Administrative Support Manual when it made its decision to contract with a third-party provider to install and maintain an Information Technology/Local Area Network (IT !LAN) wiring upgrade to Postal Equipment at Postal Vehicle Maintenance Facilities (VMFs)? If yes, what shall the remedy be?

Q6T40C11179651 - Whether the Postal Service violated Article 32 Section 1 of the National Agreement and Section 530 of the Administrative Support Manual when it made its decision to subcontract the installation of hardware upgrades to the Enhanced Airline Assignment (EAA) equipment in all P&EC's as described in Software Modification Order 19-10 and Maintenance Management Order 051-10. If yes, what shall the remedy be?

Q11T4QC12029368 - Whether the Postal Service violated Article 32 Section 1 of the National Agreement, the Contracting or Insourcing of Contracted Service MOU and Section 530 of the Administrative Support Manual when it made its decision to subcontract bargaining unit work to a third-party provider to install and maintain the Telecommunications Integrated Postal Network, (TIPN) contract, which is a replacement for the Management Network Service (MNS) contract. If yes, what shall the remedy be?

Q11T40C12038927 - Whether the Postal Service violated Article 32 Section 1 of the National Agreement, the Contracting or Insourcing of Contracted Service MOU and Section 530 of the Administrative Support Manual when it made its decision to subcontract bargaining unit work with a third-party provider to install and maintain the Automated Parcel Bundle System (APBS) retrofit of the current Small Parcel and Bundle Sorter (SPBS) fleet. If yes, what shall the remedy be?

Q11T4QC12062493 - Whether the Postal Service violated, but not limited to, Article 1 and 32 of Collective Bargaining Agreement, when it assigned non-bargaining unit workers to perform bargaining unit work, installation of software for Postal Equipment, LCREM 1.21 and EMPC 1.2.1? If yes, then what shall the remedy be?

Q11T40C12105213 - Whether the Postal Service violated Articles 19 and 32 Section 1 of the National Agreement and Section 530 of the Administrative Support Manual and prior National level arbitration decisions when it made its decision to subcontract bargaining unit work when it made its decision to contract with a third-party vendor to install the Surface Visibility Phase One Refresh ill? In addition, whether the Postal Service violated Article 32 and Article 19 by failing to notify the Union of the multi-year maintenance service agreement for the above referenced Postal Equipment? If yes, then what shall the remedy be?