NRLCA National Award Eischen: Review and Concurrence for Discipline (2003)

Review and Concurrence

return to Contract Database

Arbitrator Eischen determined that Article 16.6 of the NRLC CBA was violated if there is a "command decision" from higher authority or a joint decision by the initiating and reviewing officials to impose discipline. The Arbitrator also found that the failure of either the initiating or reviewing official to make an independent and substantive review of the evidence prior to imposing discipline or lack of evidence of written review and concurrence violated the CBA. {NOTE: This is an NRLC award. Close examination and comparison of Article 16.8 in the APWU CBA to the language of Article 16.6 in the NRLC CBA is essential.]

Document Type:  National Arbitration

Arbitrator Name: Dana Eischen

Tags: Review and Concurrence

return to Contract Database

Related Documents

SHOW FILTERS ›

E.g., 07/21/2024
E.g., 07/21/2024

National Award Das: Attendance Control Supervisors Issuing Discipline (2006)

July 7, 2006

Document Type: National Arbitration

Arbitrator Name: Shyam

Attendance Discipline, Attendance Control Supervisor

MOU: Postal Support Employee (PSE) Discipline (2013)

February 27, 2013

Document Type: Memorandum of Understanding

PSE Discipline, Progressive Discipline, PSE Work Hours, Corrective Discipline, Just Cause

Synopsis: MOU PSE Discipline (2013)

March 13, 2013

Document Type: Synopsis

PSE Discipline, Progressive Discipline, PSE Work Hours, Corrective Discipline, Just Cause